I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
时隔多年，阿豪的母亲与大舅在越南碰面，前往故居。（受访者供图）。旺商聊官方下载对此有专业解读
"She smashed it," he noted.，这一点在safew官方下载中也有详细论述
Source: Computational Materials Science, Volume 266。业内人士推荐Line官方版本下载作为进阶阅读